Only 3 Senate Republicans to put Financial Reform before Politics
Most US Senate Republicans are more intent on playing partisan politics than they are on doing their job and looking out for how to protect the American public from shady financial interests. Too many in the financial community were more intent on making a fast buck than on providing the public with fair consumer practices and honest deals. Lack of adequate consumer safeguards contributed to our near financial disaster.
We are still trying to recover. Most Republicans under their current leadership are more concerned about how to make President Obama look bad than they are on solving our financial problems. They are more intent on playing political games that they think will help them get back into power.
So when 3 Republicans show courage in bucking the do nothing approach of the Republican leadership, they are to be commended. So far Senators Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Maine Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe have said they will vote to prevent a filibuster from stopping passage of the proposed financial reform package.
Despite the New York Times characterization of the bill as “limping toward Senate passage“, I think garnering 60 votes in the US Senate is significant. My arithmetic saying that 60 votes is a hell of a lot more than 51 votes which would be a simple majority of the US Senate. The whole filibuster process stinks and its one of the factors contributing to the public low opinion of Congress. It’s time to end the filibuster.
As the New York Times notes this bill will accomplish a fair amount:
The legislation would create a system risk council comprising the most senior government regulators to try to identify potential dangers in the financial system. It would create a powerful consumer financial protection bureau to be housed in the Federal Reserve and would impose a new regulatory framework on the trading of derivatives, the complex instruments that were at the center of the 2008 downturn.
The bill seeks to avert future crises by giving government regulators the power to seize control of failing financial institutions, break them apart, sell off the assets and put them out of business, with shareholders and creditors taking losses.
The bill would also strengthen the Securities and Exchange Commission by giving it new authority over credit rating agencies , hedge funds and private equity companies.
Recent Posts
- Feedback Wanted on Proposed WA Legislative Bill on Tax Expenditure Reform
- Eric Cantor and Republican Revisionist History
- Washington State Minimum Wage to Increase to $9.04 on January 1, 2012
- Where are the Election Night Parties for King County Democrats Tonight?
- Where are Drop Boxes for Ballots in King County – Nov 8, 2011?
Archives
Categories
Tags
2008 Elections August 18 2009 Primary Barack Obama BIAW Bush campaign disclosure campaigns Chris Gregoire congress Democrats Dino Rossi elections endorsements Eyman global warming Governor Gregoire Hillary Clinton I-1033 Ingraham High School initiative 1033 Initiative 1053 initiatives John Edwards John McCain King County Democrats No on 1033 No on I-1033 politics Presidential election Property Taxes Public Disclosure Commission Republicans Save the Trees Save the Trees - Seattle Seattle City Council Seattle School Board Seattle School District Tim Eyman Trees Uncategorized Urban Forestry US Senate US Supreme Court Washington State Washington State LegislatureBlogroll
Democratic Party Organizations
Recently posted on the NPI Advocate- Rick Santorum running ahead in Minnesota, Colorado caucuses… and the Missouri primary
- Conne family’s ordeal should serve as a reminder to all of us to be prepared
- Washington’s Senate approves marriage equality legislation after long debate
- President Obama’s schedule for February 17th Seattle visit begins to take shape
- Suzanne Bonamici elected to succeed David Wu in Oregon’s 1st Congressional District





