With the passage of Tim Eyman’s Initiative 1053 last year requiring 2/3 votes of the Legislature to raise revenue, Wall Street interests and their friends were the big winners. Citizens in Washington State were the losers.
The reality is that with the citizen’s help, corporations guaranteed that their special interest loopholes and tax exemptions in Washington State would be continued on and on, without any accountability. Tax exemptions originally passed with only a majority vote now require a 2/3 vote by both houses of the Legislature to rescind or end. And this is almost impossible to do.
Wall Street and Big Business interests funding the campaign to protect their special interest tax exemptions included JP MORGAN CHASE, BP CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, WELLS FARGO, CONOCO PHILLIPS, US BANK, TESORO COMPANIES INC, AND CHEVERON to name a few.
Why do you think they wanted voters to approve I-1053? It’s an easy answer.
Corporations basically were able to grandfather in their tax exemptions by passage of Initiative 1053. They were able to do this under the camouflage of limiting taxes on average citizens. The net result is that corporations protected themselves from not just losing their special interest exemptions but it also made it impossible for the Legislature to consider any other revenue coming from these corporations regardless of how much profit they make.
Tax exemptions are expenditures of state money that would otherwise be available to fund basic services like education, health care, transportation or environmental protection. Tax exemptions need to be included in the state budget just the same as other state expenditures. And they need to have a sunset provision so that unless they are voted on to be renewed, they will automatically expire. Sunset provisions could vary from 4 to 8 years.
Tax exemptions should not be a permanent entitlement of special interests and corporations. Their continuation needed to be evaluated and voted on periodically. Their value to the state’s economy should be prioritized under the guidelines of a priorities of government evaluation.. Their continuation should be ranked as high, medium or low priority, the same as other expenditures in the state budget. When it comes time to create a state budget they should be considered the same as any other expenditure, not exempt as they now are.
This evaluation of tax expenditures is a function that the State Auditor could perform the same as is done with other programs. Tax exemptions that no longer perform a valid function for the State and its citizens should be eliminated.
It’s time now for citizens to take back their Legislature from the corporations. Giving corporations special rules to prevent their tax exemptions from being repealed by requiring higher voting requirements is contrary to the Washington State Constitution and subverts the citizen’s legislature.. Now is the time to repeal the special treatment the Wall Street interests – the Banks and other Big Corporations - gave themselves under I-1053 and return the Legislature to the people..
We need to go back to the voting system set up by the people for the Legislature by the Washington State Constitution. Passing legislation, including revenue and the state budget should be by a simple majority vote as set in the State Constitution. Requiring a higher number of votes on specific legislation winds up giving a smaller and smaller block of Legislators veto power. That gives Wall Street and Big Businesses and Big Oil power they don’t deserve and diminishes the power of the people to control their government.
It’s time to end Wall Street’s Special Protection.and return the Legislature to the citizens of this state. It’s time to repeal I-1053 and stop the unfair shift of taxation from the wealthy and special interests to the middle class.
Bellevue City Council Position 5 – Claudia Balducci
Covington City Council Position 1 -Marlla Mhoon
Federal Way City Council Position 3 – Roger Flygare
Kent City Council Position 1 – Bailey Stober
Kent School District Position 3 -Leslie Hamada
Northshore School Board Position 3 -BZ Davis
The Metropolitan Democratic Club of Seattle met this last Wednesday, Sept. 28th, and completed their final round of endorsements for the November 8, 2011 General Election. The following statement was put out by their President Justin Simmons
MDC Members and Friends,
At our meeting yesterday, September 28, the MDC made the following new endorsements for the general election to be held on Tuesday, November 8.
Seattle School Board Pos. 3
Michelle Buetow
Northshore School Board Pos. 2
Joe Marshall
WA State Initiative 1125
rejected
WA State Initiative 1163
approved
WA State Initiative 1183
rejected
WA State Senate Joint Resolution 8205
approved
WA State Senate Joint Resolution 8206
approved
Seattle Proposition 1
no action advised
Newcastle City Council – Position 4
Frank Irigon
As previously released, our Primary endorsements were the following:
King County Council
Pos. 2, Larry Gossett*
Pos. 4, Larry Phillips
Pos. 6, Richard Mitchell
Pos. 8, Joe McDermott
King County Elections Director
Sherril Huff
King County Assessor
Lloyd Hara*
Port of Seattle
Pos. 2, Gael Tarleton*
Pos. 5, Dean Willard*
Seattle City Council
Pos. 1, Jean Godden*
Pos. 3, Bruce Harrell*
Pos. 5, Tom Rasmussen*
Pos. 9, Sally Clark*
Seattle School Board
Pos. 1, Sharon Peaslee*
Pos. 2, Kate Martin*
Pos. 6, Marty McLaren
Court of Appeals, Div. 1, Dist. 1, Pos. 2
Michael Spearman
Families& Education Levy
endorsed approval
*Asterisks indicate current MDC members.
The majority of the MDC’s voting membership believes these candidates and campaigns represent and will promote the progressive values we cherish.
Thanks to all of you who participated in our endorsement process.
Democratically yours,
Justin Simmons, President
Metropolitan Democratic Club of Seattle
There is some exciting news out of Portland, Oregon. Earlier this year they completed a lengthy several year process to enact a new Urban Forest Ordinance to significantly increase protection for trees and tree groves in their city. It has incorporated many of the features tree advocates have been asking for here in Seattle, including a requirement for tree permits to remove trees on both public and private property, tree replacement required for trees removed on private property and shifting most or all of tree oversight out of DPD (Department of Planning and Development).
Portland removes tree oversight, except during development on private property, out of their Development Agency to their City Forester.They developed their new ordinance through their “Citywide Tree Policy Review and Regulatory Project“. As noted on their 2 page summary sheet, their involvement and collaboration involved “more than 1000 hours with their stakeholder group, 250 meetings in the community, two sets of open houses, five-month joint Planning Commission/Urban Forestry Commission hearing process and ongoing collaboration between six City Bureaus“.
Portland has slightly less population than Seattle, has a larger area and is striving for 33% canopy cover. (Seattle current goal is 30% in the Urban Forest Management Plan)
What is significant about Portland’s proposal is that Portland is doing a lot of what DPD says we can’t do here or doesn’t want to do. Portland is expanding their permit system to include both public and private trees. They are requiring permits (which are a way of tracking tree loss and gain) for public trees 3 inches and larger in diameter and for private trees 12 inches and larger in diameter with some overlay areas using 6 inches and larger diameter.
They are requiring tree for tree replacement for most permits, with inch for inch replacement on larger trees and groves. Seattle currently has no such replacement requirements for most trees removed on private property which makes it difficult to comply with the City Comprehensive Plan which actually calls for no net loss of canopy and increasing our tree canopy to 40%.
Portland divides their tree protection process oversight by allowing their Development arm to oversee tree protection during development and their City Forester to oversee all other tree protection. This would make sense also in Seattle as DPD is only involved with about 1% of the city’s land in any given year that is being developed. As the Seattle Urban Forestry Commission noted in their review of DPD’s proposed tree regulation changes earlier this year, DPD did not address protection for 99% of the city’s land in any given year.
Portland has taken the regional lead in setting the new standard for comprehensive urban forestry protection and Seattle needs to look closely at what Portland has done and the public process they used to arrive at their new ordinance. It is a very different model than DPD has proposed. Portland’s new ordinance is the way many other cities in our region are moving in increasing protection of trees and their urban forest. It is the way Seattle needs to move.
Links to new Portland, Oregon tree regulations:
summary of new tree regulations adopted 2011
text of new tree regulations adopted 2011
The 11th District Democrats have endorsed the following candidates and issues:
King County
Lloyd Hara, King County Assessor, Incumbent, Early Endorsed (April 2011)
Joe McDermott, King County Council, Position 1, Incumbent, Endorsed by Acclamation
Diana Toledo, King County Council, Position 1, Endorsed
City of Renton
Robin Jones, Position 5, Endorsed
Port of Seattle
Gael Tarlton, Position 2, Incumbent, Early Endorsed (May 2011)
Dean Willard, Position 5, Endorsed by acclamation
City of Kent
Bailey Stober, Kent City Council, Position 1, Endorsed
City of SeaTac
Barry Ladenburg, Position 1, Endorsed by acclamation
Mia Su-Ling Gregerson, Position 7, Incumbent, Endorsed by acclamation
City of Seattle
Jean Godden, Position 1, Incumbent, Early Endorsed (May 2011)
Maurice Claussen, Position 1, Endorsed
Bobby Forsch, Position 1, Endorsed
Bruce Harrell, Position 3, Incumbent, Early Endorsed, (April 2011)
Tom Rasmussen, Position 5, Incumbent, Early Endorsed (May 2011)
Sally Clark, Position 9, Incumbent, Early Endorsed (May 2011)
City of Tukwila
Pam Linder, Mayor, Endorsed (Unanimous)
Kate Kruller, Position 7, Endorsed (Unanimous)
Hospital District #1
Mary Alice Heuschel, Commissioner
Seattle Referendum 1 – Approve
The following includes the latest endorsements by the 36th District Democrats for the August 16, 2011 Primary and also for the November General Election:
Here is a list of candidates and issues endorsed by the 34th District Democrats for the August 16, 2011:
Seattle City Council Position #1: Jean Godden and Bobby Forch (dual endorsement)
• Seattle City Council Position #3: Bruce Harrell
• Seattle City Council Position #5: Tom Rasmussen
• Seattle City Council Position #7: Tim Burgess
• Seattle City Council Position #9: Sally Clark
• King County Council Position #8: Joe McDermott
• King County Assessor: Lloyd Hara
• King County Elections Director: Sherril Huff
• Port Commission Position 6: Gael Tarleton
• Seattle “Tunnel” Referendum - “approve” moving forward with the Tunnel
• Seattle School Director Position #6: Marty McClaren
• N. Highline Fire District Commissioner Pos #1: Liz Giba
• Seattle Families & Education Levy: YES
• Washington State Court of Appeals Division 1, Position 2: Michael Spearman
• King County Superior Court Position 24: Patrick Oishi
• Southwest Suburban Sewer District Position 3: Susan Genzale
• Southwest Suburban Sewer District Position 1: Scott Hilsen
• King County’s Veteran & Social Services Levy: Yes
The 32nd District Democrats in North King County and South Snohomish County have made their August 16, 2011 Primary Endorsements:
King County Veterans and Human Services Levy – SUPPORT
Endorsed Candidates
King County
County Assessor - Lloyd Hara
County Council Dist. 6 - Richard Mitchell & – John Creighton
Port of Seattle Commissioner Pos. 2 – Gael Tarleton
Port of Seattle Commissioner Pos. 5 – Dean Willard
Snohomish County
County Council Dist. 3 – Stephanie Wright
City of Edmonds,
Mayor – Mike Cooper
Council Pos. 4 – Diane Buckshnis
Council Pos. 5 – Joan Bloom
City of Lake Forest Park
Mayor – Mary Jane Goss
City of Kirkland
Council Pos. 4 – Jessica Greenway
Council Pos. 6 – Dave Asher
City of Shoreline
Council Pos. 2 – Chris Eggen
Council Pos. 4 – Janet Way
Council Pos. 6 – Jesse Salomon
November ballot issues:
I -1183 Liquor Privatization (Costco measure) – OPPOSE
I-1125 Transportation (Eyman initiative) - OPPOSE
The 33rd District Democrats in South King County have made the following endorsements for the August 16, 2011 Primary Election:
King County Council District No. 8: Joe McDermott
King County Assessor: Lloyd Hara
Port of Seattle Commissioner Position No. 2: Gael Tarleton
Port of Seattle Commissioner Position No. 5: Dean Willard
City of SeaTac Council Position No. 1: Barry Ladenburg
City of SeaTac Council Position No. 3: Othman Heibe
City of SeaTac Council Position No. 5: Dave Bush
City of SeaTac Council Position No. 7: Mia Su-Ling Gregerson
City of Tukwila Mayor: Pamela Linder
City of Tukwila Council Position No. 6: Kate Kruller
Court of Appeals, Division No. 1, District No. 1 Judge Position No. 2: Michael Spearman
South King Fire and Rescue Commissioner Position No. 4: Mark L. Thompson
South King Fire and Rescue Commissioner Position No. 5: James A. Fossos
Highline School District Director Position No. 1: Sili Savusa
The 37th District Democrats in South Seattle have made their endorsements for the August 16, 2011 Primary.. It is a top 2 Primary with the top 2 voter getters in a race moving on to the November ballot. It is an all mail in ballot and voters must have their ballots postmarked by Tuesday August 16, 2011 to count,
37th District Democrats Primary Endorsements:
King County Measures
King County Proposition No. 1 Renewal of the Veterans and Human Services Levy
APPROVE
King County Candidates
Joe McDermott – King County Council District 8
Dean Willard – Port of Seattle Commission Position 5
Local and Municipal Candidates
Bobby Forch – Seattle City Council Position 1
Tom Rasmussen – Seattle City Council Position 5
Sally J. Clark – Seattle City Council Position 9
Ed Prince – Renton City Council Position 5
Kate Kruller – Tukwila City Council Position 6
Local and Municipal Measures
City of Tukwila Proposition No. 1 Formation and Funding of Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District
APPROVE
Archives
Categories
Tags
2008 Elections August 18 2009 Primary Barack Obama BIAW Bush campaign disclosure campaigns Chris Gregoire congress Democrats Dino Rossi elections endorsements Eyman global warming Governor Gregoire Hillary Clinton I-1033 Ingraham High School initiative 1033 Initiative 1053 initiatives John Edwards John McCain King County Democrats No on 1033 No on I-1033 politics Presidential election Property Taxes Public Disclosure Commission Republicans Save the Trees Save the Trees - Seattle Seattle City Council Seattle School Board Seattle School District Tim Eyman Trees Uncategorized Urban Forestry US Senate US Supreme Court Washington State Washington State LegislatureDemocratic Organizations - National
Democratic Organizations - Washington State
Progressive Media and Blogs - National
Progressive Media and Blogs - Washington State
Progressive Organizations - National
Progressive Organizations - Washington State
Recently posted on the NPI Advocate- Baumgartner comes to WWU, response is lukewarm
- BP and ConocoPhillips revealed as the big money behind Tim Eyman’s I-1185
- PubliCola closes its doors; writers moving gossip site’s feature columns to Crosscut
- François Hollande elected President of France; Nicolas Sarkozy ousted after one term
- President Obama returning to the Evergreen State for more fundraising events

