November 2, 2012
By Email and U.S. Mail
416 Sid Snyder Ave. S.W.
Legislative Building
Olympia, WA
Dear Secretary Reed:
I represent the Washington State Democratic Party. It has come to our attention that the King County Republican Party is informing voters that they can and should drop off voted ballots not at county election offices or U.S. mailboxes, but instead a temporary pick up locations staffed by Republican party operatives. Worse, these actions are being taken in direct contravention of guidance from the King County Elections Department. http://www.kingcounty.gov/elections.aspx.
This initiative is as ill-considered as it is unprecedented. There is a reason why nonpartisan election officials conduct our elections and the prospect of having partisan operatives collect voted ballots and return them to the elections office is chilling indeed. It is especially concerning in light of press reports from around the country about deliberate efforts by Republican Party officials to disenfranchise Democratic voters by collecting and then destroying their voter registration applications. See, e.g., http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57535950/man-charged-after-tossing-voter-registration-forms-in-virginia/.
Worse, state law makes it a felony for a person to either directly or indirectly offer “anything of value” to a voter in exchange for a vote. RCW 29A.84.620. The collection and delivery of ballots at the expense of the Republican Party seems a plain and clear violation of that statute.
As Washington’s chief elections officer, I ask that you defend our tradition of nonpartisan election administration and call upon the King County Republican Party to immediately cease and desist from this, frankly, badly misguided effort and consider appropriate legal action if that becomes necessary.
Very truly yours,
Kevin J. Hamilton
KJH:wbs
Last weekend the Washington State Democratic Central Committee had a quarterly meeting in Walla Walla. They passed resolutions opposing Tim Eyman’s budget freeze Initiative 1033 and supporting passing Referendum 71. Both measures are on the November 3rd, 2009 ballot.
The No on 1033 resolution noted that the Democrats are firmly opposed to I-1033 and “encourages their members to educate voters about the potential consequences of I-1033 and to work to defeat it.”
You can see some of the other 180 plus organizations signed on to oppose I-1033 and learn what you can do to help by visiting the No on 1033 campaign website.
The Approve Referendum 71 resolution states that the Washington State Democrats endorse the Washington Families Standing Together Campaign and “urges approval of Referendum 71 in order to retain the domestic partnership law” passed by the Washington State Legislature.
To support the efforts to approve Referendum 71, you can visit the Approve Referendum 71 campaign website.
The Washington State Republican Party has voted previously to support I-1033 and oppose Referendum 71. They are pretty much alone in their position on Initiative 1033 as no other major groups have come out in support of I-1033
I-1033 proposes to freeze the budgets of the state and all 39 counties and 281 cities at the current recession level and use any revenue coming in above the current budget to pay property taxes rather than fund education or health care or any other public services. The big losers are renters which are 35% of households in the state whereas the winners would be large property owners, including corporations.
Archives
Categories
Tags
2008 Elections August 18 2009 Primary Barack Obama BIAW Bush campaign disclosure campaign finance Chris Gregoire congress Democrats Dino Rossi elections endorsements fuel efficiency standards George Bush global warming Governor Gregoire Hillary Clinton I-1033 Ingraham High School initiative 1033 Initiative 1053 initiatives John McCain King County Democrats No on 1033 No on I-1033 Peter Goldmark Presidential election Property Taxes Public Disclosure Commission Republicans Save the Trees - Seattle Seattle City Council Seattle School Board Seattle School District Senator Cantwell Tim Eyman Trees Urban Forestry US Senate US Supreme Court Washington State Washington State Legislature Washington State Supreme CourtDemocratic Organizations - National
Democratic Organizations - Washington State
Progressive Media and Blogs - National
- Alternet
- America Votes
- Campaign for America's Future
- Common Dreams
- Daily Kos
- Environment 360
- George Lackoff
- Hightower Lowdown
- Huffington Post – Politics
- Liberal Oasis
- Media Matters
- Mother Jones
- Moyers and Company
- NPR
- Paul Krugman
- Progressive America Rising
- Progressive States Network News
- Talking Points Memo
- The Daily Show
- The Maddow Blog
- the Nation
- The Progressive
- Think Progress
- Thom Hartmann
- Truthdig
- UTNE Reader
- Yes!
Progressive Media and Blogs - Washington State
Progressive Organizations - National
- Ballot Initiative Strategy Center
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Economic and Policy Research
- Citizens for Tax Justice
- Commonweal Institute
- CREW
- Earth Policy Institute
- Economic Policy Institute
- Friends of the Earth
- League of Conservation Voters
- MoveOn.org
- New America Foundation
- Progress Now
- Progressive States Network
- Rocky Mountain Institute
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- United for a Fair Economy
Progressive Organizations - Washington State
Recently posted on the NPI Advocate- Christy Clark declares victory in B.C., but trails the NDP’s David Eby in her own riding
- Not-so liberal Liberals projected to win in British Columbia; score huge upset over NDP
- The Tyee: British Columbia’s New Democratic Party poised for a landslide victory tonight
- B.C. Journal: A Tsawwassen sunset
- B.C. Journal: Liberals hold telephone town hall to connect supporters to leader Clark

